Accounting risks factors of appearance accident situations during exploitation of buildings

Authors

Keywords:

technical state, computer technologies of design, safety, stress strain state, emergency situation, bearing structures, risk, nonlinear analysis

Abstract

Aim. To classify dangers and possible damages of different structural elements and develop methods that enable you to avoid undue risks and losses during maintenance of structures. Methodology. is to identify probability of undesirable consequences in different possible service situations and to develop the algorithm for analysis of structures with prediction of their behaviour in partial damage or partial bearing-capacity failure. If there are unaccounted, unforeseen and undefined factors that cause the damage of the structure at the stage of maintenance; when you apply logic analysis to determine probability of undesirable cases in different possible (even theoretically) service situations that should be stipulated during design and erection of high-rise building; when you apply logic methods for analysis of ‘trees of cases’ or ‘trees of refuses’, it is possible to measure the risk of transformation from emergency situation to an accident and to find out resources to avoid occurrence of progressive damage of the structure. Using theory of probability, we calculate probability of undesired case as a function of danger. The author develops method for analysis of consequences of refuses (ACR) to identify dangers. ACR is the inductive type of analysis, it helps to consider in series one element after another, evaluate all possible types of refuses or emergency situations and determine their total effect of the whole structural system. Results. The author presents research algorithms for refuses of structural elements and structural systems and develolops method to measure the risk of an accident. Safety regulations for the building structure are also suggested. Scientific novelty of the paper is to enhance the method for measuring risk of an accident in structural elements and structural sysems based on static simulation methods. Practical significance. This method enables you to determine numerical value of risk of emergency situation in the building that consists of a system of structural elements with independent equally possible refuses at any stage of the maintenance of the structure.

Author Biography

M. S. Barabash, National Aviation University.

Department of Computer Technologies of Construction,

Dr. Sc., Ass.-prof.

References

V.Akimov. Basic aspects of analysis and management of risk in natural and technogenic areas / V.Akimov, V.Lesnykh, N.Radaev. – M.: Delovoy express, 2004. –352 p.

V.Almazov. Accidents and monitoring. The guildelines for designers and builders / V.Almazov. – M. : MGSU, 2008. – 31 p.

M.Barabash. Analysis of reliability of high-rise building with account of risk of progressive damage / M.Barabash, K.Myslyvets // Research journal: Budivnytstvo Ukrainy. – 2010. – № 5 – p. 37–41.

M.Barabash. Research on survivability of building structures in emergency situations / M.Barabash, A.Gorodetsky // Construction, material science, mechanical engineering // Collection of research papers –Dnepropetrovsk: PSACEA, 2010. – № 56. – p.123–128.

M.Barabash. Computer simulation of life cycle in building objects: Monograph / M.Barabash. – K.: ‘Stal’ Publ., 2014. – 301 p

M.Barabash. Methods for minimizing of probability of progressive damage in high-rise building during earthquake load / M.Barabash, Y.Genzersky, Y.Pokotilo // scientific journal: New technologies in construction. –2011. – № 1 (21). – p.17–23.

M.Barabash. Providing structural safety for design ofhigh-rise buildings with LIRA-SAPR software / M.Barabash, M.Romashkina // Development prospects for software packages for analysis of bearing systems of buildings and structures // Collection of research papers, International scientific seminar, September 19–20, 2013 – Kursk, 2013. – p. 73–83.

A.Vetoshkin. Reliability of technical systems and technogenic risk / A.Vetoshkin. – Penza: PGUAS Publ., 2003. – 154 p.

A.Dobromyslov. Errors in design of building structures: scientific ed. / A.Dobromyslov – M.: Publ. Association of construction institutes, 2007. – 184 p.

Survivability of buildings and structures in beyonddesign loads: [scientific ed.]/ V.Kolchunov, N.Klyueva, N.Androsova, A.Bukhtiyarova. – M.: ACB Publ., 2014.-208 p.

General principles for providing reliability and structural safety of buildings, structures and foundations: DBN V.1.2-14-2009. – [Valid from 01-12-2009]. – K.: Minregionbud of Ukraine, 2009. – 45 p. (building code of Ukraine).

S.Klovanich. Safety and durability of structures: Study course / S.Klovanich. – Odessa: OGASA – 2001. – 30 p.

M. Korgina. Evaluation of stress strain state of loadbearing structures in buildings during monitoring of their technical state: PhD dis. ... : 05.23.01 / M.Korgina. – M., 2008. – 225 p.

A.Melchakov. About format of technical regulation by the amount of risk of accident of buildings and structures / A.Melchakov, A.Vasiljev, M.Kosogorova // Vestnik of South Ural State University. Series ‘Construction and architecture’. – 2007. – № 22. – p. 29–33.

A.Perelmuter. Selected problems of safety and reliability of building structures / A.Perelmuter. – M.: ACB Publ., 2007. – 254 p.

Izzudin B.A., Vlassis A.G., Elghazouli A.Y., Nethercot D.A. Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss, Part I, Engineering structures 20 (2008), 1308-1318; part II, Engineering structures 30 (2008). – Р. 1424–1438.

Marchand K. A. Blastand Progressive Collapse / Kirk A. Marchand, Farid Alfawakhive. – AISC, 2005.

Issue

Section

Innovative lifecycle technology of housing and civil, industrial and transportation purposes