International preventive and counter-measures against the chemical and biological terrorism

Authors

  • D. ADASKOVA University of Economics in Bratislava, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, People's 12, 974 01 Banská Bystrica., Slovenia
  • R. KAZANSKY University of Economics in Bratislava, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, People's 12, 974 01 Banská Bystrica., Slovenia

Keywords:

chemical weapons, biological weapons, terrorism, security threat

Abstract

The WMD terrorism belongs to current most compelling security threats. It has its roots yet in the 1970s. The interconnection of the most destructive weapon and terrorist groups reaby to cause a large number of casualties and extensive material damage resulted in international efforts and a complex agenda to fight against the security threat. The main aim of the article is to analyse main legal and institutional instruments of the chemical and biological non-proliferation and disarmament regime and to critically assess their contribution to preventing and countering the chemical and biological terrorism security threat.

Author Biographies

D. ADASKOVA, University of Economics in Bratislava, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, People's 12, 974 01 Banská Bystrica.

PhD

R. KAZANSKY, University of Economics in Bratislava, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic, People's 12, 974 01 Banská Bystrica.

PhD

References

Nuclear, biological and chemical weapons (also known as NBC weapons) are generally considered as weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Modern definitions include also radiological weapons (altogether known as CBRN weapons) and sophisticated high explosive conventional devices (altogether known as CBRNE weapons).

Kazansky, R. (2011) Bezpecnostna politika - teoria konfliktov. Banska By strica : Univerzita Mateja Bela Fakulta politickych vied a medzinarodnych vzfahov, p. 126;

In the article the term is used for the nuclear, chemical and bioterrorism, altogether known as the WMD terrorism. The scientific literature uses also terms such as CBRN terrorism, superterrorism, ultraterrorism, catastrophic terrorism etc.

Cole, B (2011) The Changing Face of Terrorism: How Real is the Threat from Biological, Chemical and Nuclear Weapons? London: LB. Tauris, p. 277;

Skvrnda, F. (2005) Nove chapanie bezpecnosti a pohTad na terorizmus ako bezpecnostnu hrozbu v sucasnom svete. In Medzinarodny terorizmus, bezpecnost' a vlada zakona: zbornik z medzinarodneho vedeckeho seminara. Bratislava: Vydavatel'stvo EKONOM, pp. 7-18;

Lkfak, J., Srb, V. (2008) Medzinarodny terorizmus a fenomen chudoby. In Bezpecnosf krajin V-4 v rozsirenom priestore NATO: zbornik prispevkov z medzinarodnej vedeckej konferencie Skalica: Stredoeuropska vysoka skola v Skalici,pp. 120-130;

Eichler, J. (2010) Terorismus avalky v dobe globalizace. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, p. 397;

Ball, D. Y., Hair, L. M., Mcvey, T., Nacht, M. (2009) Preventing WMD Terrorism. In Maurer, S. M. (ed.) WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 483 - 510;

The NPT has currently 190 State Parties.

Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Office of the Coordina¬tor for Counterterrorism 1967. URT: http://www.un.org/disarmamentAVMD/Nuclear/pdf/NPTEnglish_Text.pdf

Cech, E. (2012) Vybrane problemy iranskej zahranicnej politiky v Strednej Azii. In Almanach: aktualne otazky svetovej ekonomiky a politiky. Bratislava: Fakulta medzinarodnych vzfahov Ekonomickej univerzity v Bratislave, pp. 5-28;

According to the NPT there are 5 recognized Nuclear-Weapon States: the USA, the Russian Federation, the Great Britain, France and China.

Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism 1967. URL: <http://www.un.org/disarmamentAVMD/ Nuclear/pdf/NPTEnglish_Text.pdf>

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction. UN General Assem¬bly 1993. URL: <http://www.opcw.org/mdex.php?eID=dam_frontend_push& docID=6357>

The CWC contains a list of specific toxic chemicals and their precursors in its Annex that are subject to the CWC verification mechanism.

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction. UN General Assem¬bly 1993. URL: <http://www.opcw.org/mdex.php?eID=dam_frontend_push& docID=6357>

Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction. UN General Assembly 1993. URL: <http://www.opcw.org/mdex.php?eID=dam_frontend_push& docID=6357>

Ball, D. Y., Hair, L. M., Mcvey, T., Nacht, M. (2009) Preventing WMD Terrorism. In Maurer, S. M. (ed.) WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 483 - 510;

Currently, the CWC has 188 State Parties. States that have not ratified the treaty yet are Israel and Myanmar. States that have not adopted the treaty are. Angola, Egypt, DPRK, Somalia, South Sudan and Syria.

According to the BTWC these are microbiological and other biological agents' that have not prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purpose and weapons, equipments and means of delivery designed to use for hostile purposes or in armed conflicts. (Convenion on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weaponsand on Their Destruction. UN General Assembly 1972. URL <http://www.opbw.org/convention/documents/btwctext.pdf>)

Uryadnikova I., Zaplatynskyi V. Social and Psychological Risks Arised in Population and Cleaners as a Result of the Chernobyl Accident. // Sciense & military. - L. Mikulas, Slovak Republik. Armed Forces Academy og General Milan Rastislav Stefanik. No 2, Volume 6, 2011. P. 68-71 EV 2061/08, ISSN 1336-8885

Convenion on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpilling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weaponsand on Their Destruction. UN General Assembly 1972. URL: <http://www.opbw.org/convention/ documents/btwctext.pdf>

Convenion on the Pronibition of the Development, Production and Stockpilling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weaponsand on Their Destruction. UN General Assembly 1972. URL: <http://www.opbw.org/convention/ documents/btwctext.pdf>

Zaplatynskyi V. Specialna priprava na likvidaciu jadrovych havarii. // Zbornik vedeckych a odbomych prac. Psychologicke a sociologicke aspekty podpory a pomoci personam v nasadeni. Zbornik elektronickych verzii recenzovanych prispevkov na CD - nosici. - Liptovsky Mikulas. Akademie ozbrojenych sil generala M.R. Stefanika. 2011. - S. 236-240. ISBN: 978-80-8040-430-7

The problem with the absence of the verification mechanism to the BTWC had to be eliminated by a legally binding Verification protocol to the BTWC. In 1991 an expert group was charged by the BTWC Review Conference with the preparation of the protocol. According to the Protocol proposal an Organiza¬tion for the prohibition of biological weapons should have been established. Its functions and activities should have been similar to functions and activities of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. However the final text of the Protocol was not approved at the BTWC Review Conference in 2001. A decision was adopted during the conference that the State Parties to the BTWC would hold a conference yearly in order to discuss challenges in biological weapons proliferation on political and expert level. (Tuma, M. (2004) Nesifeni zbrani hromadneho niceni v kontextu aktualnich otazek mezinarodni bezpecnosti a boje proti terorismu. Brno: Ustav strategickych studii UNOB, p. 234;)

The absence of the BTWC verification mechanism resulted in the fact that after the BTWC ratification several States Parties continued in the violation of the treaty provisions and they continued to develop military biological programmes. These State Parties were the USSR, Iraq, Libya and South Africa. (Guillemm, J. (2005) Biological Weapons. New York: Columbia University Press, p. 242;

Tuma, M. (2004) Nesifeni zbrani hromadneho niceni v kontextu aktualnich otazek mezinarodni bezpecnosti a boje proti terorismu. Bmo: Ustav strategickych studii UNOB, p. 234;

IAEA Safeguards Overview: Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols. International Atomic Enenrgy Agency 2012. URL: <http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Factsheets/English/sg_overview.html>

Cooley, J. N. (2006) International Atomic Energy Agency Safeguards under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Challenges in Implementation. In AVENHAUS, R., KYRIAKOPOULOS, N, RICHARD, M., STEIN, G. (eds.) Verifying Treaty Compliance: Limiting Weapons of Mass Destruction and Monitoring Kyoto Protocol Provisions. Berlin: Springer, pp. 61-76;

Nuclear Security Plan for 2010-2013. IAEA 2009. URL:<http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC53/GC53Documents/Englih/gc53-18_en.pdf>.

Prevention of Malicious Acts. IAEA 2012. URL: <http://www-ns.iaea.org/ security/prevention. asp? s=4&l=26>

These are: Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Convention on Nuclear Safety and Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material.

Tuma, M. (2004) Nesifeni zbrarri hromadneho mceni vkontextu aktualnich otazek mezmarodrri bezpecnosti a boje proti terorismu. Brno: Ustav strategickych studii UNOB, p. 234;

Prevention of Malicious Acts. IAEA 2012. URL: <http;//www-ns. iaea. org/security/prevention, asp9 s=4&l=26>

An orphan nuclear source is a source containing a significant amount of radioactive material that is not under an adequate physical protection and control as a consequence of a loss, theft, unauthorized displacement or transfer.

Nuclear Security Plan for 2010-2013. IAEA 2009. URL: <http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC53/GC53Documents/English/gc53-18_en.pdf>.

Tuma, M. (2004) Nesifeni zbrarri hromadneho rricem v kontextu aktualnich otazek mezhiarodrri bezpecnosti a boje proti terorismu. Brno: Ustav strategickych studii UNOB, p. 234;

The OPCW and the Global Struggle against Terrorism. OPCW 2012. URL: <http://www.opcw.org/about-chemical-weapons/chemical-terrorism/the-opcw-and-the-global-struggle-against-terrorism/>

Ball, D. Y., Hair, L. M., Mcvey, T., Nacht, M. (2009) Preventing WMD Ter¬rorism. In Maurer, S. M. (ed.) WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 483 - 510;

The OPCW has elaborated a database of 1500 chemical compounds that could be potentially misused for the production of chemical weapons. (Ormerod, D. L., Ghosh, T. K., Viswanath, D. S. (2010) Chemical Terrorism: Threats and Countermeasures. In Ghosh, T. K., Prelas, M. A., Viswanath, D. S, Loyalka, S. K. (eds.) Science and Technology of Terrorism. New York: CRC Press, pp. 457-468.)

The State Parties have the obligation to declare factories producing more than 200 tons of specific organic chemical compounds and more than 300 tons of organic compounds containing phosphorus, sulphur and fluorine. (Ormerod, D. L., Ghosh, T. K., Viswanath, D. S. (2010) Chemical Terrorism: Threats and Countermeasures. In Ghosh, T. K., Prelas, M A., Viswanath, D. S, Loyalka, S. K. (eds.) Science and Technology of Terrorism. New York: CRC Press, pp. 457 - 468.)

Tuma, M. (2004) Nesifeni zbrarri hromadneho niceni vkontextu aktualnich otazek mezhiarodrri bezpecnosti a boje proti terorismu. Brno: Ustav strategickych studii UNOB, p. 234;

Tuma, M. (2004) Nesifeni zbrarri hromadneho niceni vkontextu aktualnich otazek mezhiarodrri bezpecnosti a boje proti terorismu. Brno: Ustav strategickych studii UNOB, p. 234;

Kazansky, R. (2012) The security policy - cooperation of actors. In Journal on Law, Economy & Management. STS Science Centre, pp. 39-45;

Downloads

Published

2013-10-17

Issue

Section

Life Safety