Research requirements for information-analytical component identification man-made risks

Authors

  • O. N. Hunchenko Department of physical education and labour protection, State University of telecommunications, Solomenskaya St. 7, 03680, Kiev, Ukraine
  • A. S. Belikov Department of safety, State higher educational institution «Pridneprovsk State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture» Chernishevskogo St., 24-a, 49600, Dnipro, Ukraine
  • N. A. Kasyanov Department of labor protection and the environment, Kyiv National University of construction and architecture, Vozdukhoflotsky av., 31, 03680, Kiev, Ukraine
  • P. І. Stefanovich Department of labor protection and the environment, Kyiv National University of construction and architecture, Vozdukhoflotsky av., 31, 03680, Kiev, Ukraine
  • E. S. Sukharevskaya Department of information technology security, National Aviation University, Komarova av., 1, 03680 Kiev, Ukraine

Keywords:

industrial risks, risk management, information-analytical component, system of emergency response

Abstract

Goal. The aim of the study is to improve the information and analytical component of the definition of man-caused risks for the emergency response (ER) system. Methodology. The factors analyses is the most convenient tool for studying the processes of the influence of initiating factors on the indicators of technogenic risk and the development of emergency situations, with the help of which it is possible to solve the problem of determining the regularities that exist under the influence of internal and external factors. Results. It is shown that the problem of determining objective quantitative indicators of the state of man-caused risk and the reliability of the human-machine-environment system functioning is topical and related to the improvement of existing methods and tools on the basis of the same and understandable under practical conditions, regardless of the specifics of production, the system approach. The latter should be based on a risk assessment, not only as a safety management method, but also as a means of implementing the developed measures to prevent, reduce or eliminate harmful and dangerous production factors (HDPF). But it also requires improvement and simplification through the development and use of criteria for determining the HDPF to assess the social and economic effectiveness of activities in this risk management system, which must be taken into account in the production environment. The scientific novelty. It is proved that the development and improvement of methods for analysis and assessment of risks is not only the removal of insignificant effects on the effect of HDPF from them, but also the perfect consideration of the risk of generative factors and mechanisms of occurrence of emergencies. It is shown that the improvement of approaches to risk assessment should be carried out on a common indicator that will allow comparison of the effect of HDPF having different origins with carriers in the form of various types of energy, taking into account the overall effect of the contribution or the weight fraction of individual factors and the definition of an integrated hazard level of the technical system. Practical significance. The influence of initiating factors improves the information and analytical component of determining the technogenic risk for the emergency response system, which simplifies the disclosure of the mechanism of the formation of cause-effect relationships between the process of occurrence and change in risk, allows you to predict its performance and justify them to minimize their values.

Author Biographies

O. N. Hunchenko, Department of physical education and labour protection, State University of telecommunications, Solomenskaya St. 7, 03680, Kiev

Cand. Sc.(Tech), Assoc.

A. S. Belikov, Department of safety, State higher educational institution «Pridneprovsk State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture» Chernishevskogo St., 24-a, 49600, Dnipro

Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof.

N. A. Kasyanov, Department of labor protection and the environment, Kyiv National University of construction and architecture, Vozdukhoflotsky av., 31, 03680, Kiev

Dr. Sc. (Tech.), Prof.

P. І. Stefanovich, Department of labor protection and the environment, Kyiv National University of construction and architecture, Vozdukhoflotsky av., 31, 03680, Kiev

Ass., Prof.

E. S. Sukharevskaya, Department of information technology security, National Aviation University, Komarova av., 1, 03680 Kiev

stud.

References

Bagrov A.V. and Murtazov A.K. Tekhnogennye sistemy i teoriia riska [Technogenic systems and risk theory]. Rjazanskij gos. un-t im. S.A. Esenina – [The Ryazan state. S. Yesenin University] – Riazan', 2010, 207 р. (in Russian).

Bielikov A.S., Kasianov M.A., Hunchenko O.M. and Tyshchenko Yu.A. Obhruntuvannia neobkhidnosti upravlinnia vyrobnychym ryzykom [Substantiation of the need to manage industrial risk]. Stroitelstvo, materialovedenie, mashinostroenie – [Construction, materials science, mechanical engineering]. PDABA. Dnipro, 2016, no. 93, pp. 93-105. (in Ukrainian).

Vladimirov V.A., Izmalkov V.I. and Izmalkov A.V. Otsenka riska i upravlenie tekhnogennoy bezopasnost'iu [Risk assessment and management of man-made safety]. – Moscow: FID «Delovoy ekspress», 2002, 184 p. (in Russian).

Hunchenko O.M., Belikov A.S., Kasianov M.A., Shalomov V.A. and Stefanovych P.I. Vdoskonalennia metodyky otsinky i upravlinnia vyrobnychym ryzykom [Improvement of the methodology of assessment and management of industrial risk]. Novyny inzhenernoi nauky Prydniprovia – [Engineering Science News of the Dnieper] – Dnipro: DVNZ PDABA, 2017, no. 1 (2). – pp. 30-38. (in Ukrainian).

Zhivetin V.B. Vvedenie v analiz riska [Introduction to Risk Analysis]. Riski i bezopasnost' chelovecheskoy deyatel'nosti – [Risks and safety of human activity] – Moscow: Inf.-izd. tsentr «Bon Antsa», 2008, 384 p. (in Russian).

Kasianov M.A., Vyshnevskyi D.O., Savchenko I.V. and Hunchenko O.M. Doslidzhennia vyrobnychoho ryzyku u kovalskopresovykh tsekhakh [Investigation of industrial risk in blacksmith's workshops] – Luhansk: Noulidzh, 2014, 224 p. (in Ukrainian).

Kolesnikov E.Ju. Sposoby kolichestvennoy otsenki neopredelennosti parametrov tekhnogennogo riska [Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of technogenic risk parameters]. Bezopasnost’ truda v promyshlennosti [Occupational safety at work] –2013, no. 1, pp. 56-66. (in Russian).

Levashov S.P. Monitoring i analiz professional'nykh riskov v Rossii i za rubezhom [Monitoring and analysis of professional risks in Russia and abroad] – Kurgan:. Kurganskogo gos. un-ta Publ., 2013, 345 p. (in Russian).

Murtonen Mervi. Otsenka riskov na rabochem meste. Prakticheskoe posobie: opyt Finliandii [Risk assessment in the workplace] – Perm': Publ. Permskogo GTU, 2010. – 64 p. (in Russian).

Riabinin I.A. Nadezhnost' i bezopasnost' strukturno-slozhnyh sistem [Reliability and security of structurally complex systems] – SPb.: Politekhnika, 2000, 248 p. (in Russian).

Henli E.Dzh. Nadezhnoe proektirovanie tekhnicheskikh sistem i otsenka riska [Reliable engineering of technical systems and risk assessment] – Kiev: Vyshha shkola Publ., 1987, 542 p. (in Russian).

Bühlmann Hans. Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory / Hans Bühlmann.– Berlin: Springer, 1996, 223 p.

IEC 61882:2001. «Hazard and operability studies (HAZOP studies) – Application guide» (Doslidzhennia nebezpeky i pratsezdatnosti (HAZOP). Kerivnytstvo do zastosuvannia). – [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Avaliable at: http://www.complexdoc.ru/ntdpdf/544425/menedzhment_riska_issledovanie_opasnosti_i_rabotosposobnosti_prikladnoe.pdf

Published

2017-10-24

Issue

Section

Computer systems and information technologies in education, science and management